Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Sorry, Mrs. Curmudgeon


“Hey, Curmudge, what’s with the title?  I was anticipating more discussion on neuroplasticity.”

“That will be delayed a bit, Julie.  I encountered an editorial in the Wall Street Journal (3/03/14) that dumps on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for their handling of a drug that is effective against idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).”

“Oo, that’s the disease that killed Mrs. Curmudgeon in January 2011.”

“Right.  That plus a generous dollop of pneumonia as the coup de grâce.  Actually, we’re not completely certain which was the ultimate culprit, but I’m always on the alert for articles on pulmonary fibrosis.”

“So what did the Journal say, Old Guy?  Whatever it was, it seems to have stoked your boiler.”

“A small biotech firm called InterMune released the results from a third randomized controlled (Phase III) trial of pirfenidone.  The FDA ruled that the results of the first two trials were insufficient for approval and demanded the third.
Trial details, showing a delay in the decline of patients’ lung function and a prolonging of life, are shown in the InterMune website.  Furthermore, the Journal said that pirfenidone had been available in Japan since 2008, in the EU since 2011, and Canada since 2012.”

“You recall, Professor, that in our earlier postings we discussed clinical trials and searching the medical literature. Then more recently we mentioned the challenges of diagnosing and treating your wife’s disease.  One pathologist (local) said it was nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (treatable) and the other (at Mayo Clinic) said it was idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (fatal).”

“For whatever disease it was, the treatment prescribed was that which was recommended by the American Thoracic Society in 2000 for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.  That was a combination of a corticosteroid (prednisone) and an immunosuppressant agent (Imuran) which, by the way, was never evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.”       

“I would bet, Curmudge, that these meds mucked up your wife’s resistance to her subsequent case of pneumonia.”

“Very likely.  So I began scouring the literature in search of a better med for IPF, and I learned of trials of many classes of potentially valuable compounds. (1) When I asked about this work in the fall of 2010, the response from the local medical community was that nothing looked very promising.”

“But that response was out of date, Old Guy.  A report from a meeting on May 17, 2009—over a year before your question—was titled, Pirfenidone shows promise for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.  And there was a Cochrane Review (2), updated July 7, 2010, that concluded, ‘pirfenidone appears to improve progression-free survival and, to a lesser extent, pulmonary function in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.’ “

“You know, Julie, even if everyone had known about pirfenidone, there wasn’t much that could have been done without FDA approval.  And according to the Journal, that hasn’t been achieved even yet.  The only possibility would have been to enroll Mrs. Curmudgeon in the next trial.”

“So what’s the bottom line, Old Widower?  We can’t bring her back to life.”

“I guess I should apologize to her ghost.  On behalf of myself for not raising more hell with the medical community, on behalf of the medical community for being behind the curve in reading the literature, and on behalf of the FDA for being self-serving, foot-dragging bureaucrats.  Sorry about that, Mrs. Curmudgeon.”

Kaizen Curmudgeon
                      
1.    http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/301226-medication  The report at this site accessed in 2010 is no longer available.
2.    Spagnolo, P., et al. Non-steroid agents for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 9, Art. No. : CD003134.  First published online: July 21, 2003.  Last assessed as up-to-date: July 27, 2010.

P.S.—In the Letters to the Editor section of today’s Wall Street Journal (3/12/14, p. A18) L. Salzman states, “My dad took pirfenidone during the last two years of his life.  He believed, as I do, that it dramatically slowed his pulmonary fibrosis…  He couldn’t travel regularly to Japan, where the drug is approved, due to his health, so he bought it online—a crime.”  “…on one occasion his medicine was seized by U.S. Customs, leaving him without the drug for nearly a month during which time his condition took a rapid turn for the worse.”    

Link to posting from blog archives: A day in a hospital in Prague 4/23/09

No comments: